Interception of Blackberry Services in India

There has been a lot of uproar about the recent development of accessing and intercepting the data by the Indian Government pertaining to Blackberry Services. The issues involved in these can be classified as follows -:

1. Can the Government intercept the communication on the Blackberry Networks?

2. Does it pose any threat to the privacy of the individual or corporation?

3. Is Government in a legal right to have access to such communications or block the access to the services of Blackberry for Indian Consumers?

4. Is Research in Motion (RIM)  liable under Indian Laws for any Breach of Indian Laws, being Canadian Corporation and having the data in Canada?

5. Is this the beginning or end?

I would like to deal with these issues in the following manner

A. Can Government intercept the Communication on the Blackberry Networks?

If the services are provided in the Indian Territory and the data is originating or passing through Indian Computer Resource, the Government has a legal right to intercept, block and monitor the traffic data under the provisions of Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008. The Government can do the above acts provided the government suspects any threat to the National Security or Friendly relations with the other states. It can also order to collect, retain and monitor the data if the said data is transmitted for the purposes of spreading computer contaminant or viruses .

The issue involved in the recent Research in Motion (RIM) controversy is the decryption of the data that can allow Indian Government to intercept the suspected communication. At the moment the data travels from user to the Blackberry servers in Canada in an encrypted format and is decrypted by the recipient of the data automatically through the use of server generated key which Research in Motion (RIM) alleges is not known to them or any of its employees.

The government can certainly intercept the communication if there is an element of suspicion.

I have also been hearing that there has been an advice to the various governments to hack the keys in case they so require for the purposes of National Security rather than asking Research in Motion (RIM) to comply with the Indian requirements. In my view, that is totally wrong and I can never believe in the term Ethical Hacking. To me, the act done unauthorizedly without the permission of the owner can never be termed as ethical. Therefore, the Indian Government for that purpose has taken the right approach to deal with the matter specially which has been the need of the hour in light of  terrorist attacks of 26/11 in Mumbai.

B. Does it pose any threat to the privacy of the individual or corporation?

I agree the privacy is certainly compromised but I think National Security is of utmost importance. I do not think that government is trying to intercept each and every communication of every individual and corporation. It is only when there is a need to intercept in extreme circumstances arises or on the Intelligence inputs, the government needs to intercept and monitor the traffic.

Privacy is fundamental right and every individual has a vested right to enjoy the same but at the same time criminals should not take advantage of this and put the lives of people on stake. I think we should all agree to this proposition and try to change our mind sets accordingly.

Secondly, if one feels the data transmitted through the servers is highly sensitive then the same can be protected through various technological means available in the world today. In this manner the integrity of data is also maintained and the data of sensitive nature can also be protected.

C. Is Government in a legal right to have access to such communications or block the access to the services of Blackberry for Indian Consumers?

As mentioned earlier, it’s a legal right of the government to intercept, block and monitor or collect traffic data if the same is being transmitted using computer resource of the country.

Section 69, 69A and 69B of the Indian Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008 empowers the Central or State Governments to appoint agency to intercept, block and monitor or collect traffic data in this regard if such data poses threat to the National Security or friendly relations with other states.

The intermediaries are required to provide access to the data required by any agencies of the Central or State Government in compliance with the requirements. Failure to provide such access or information by the intermediaries can attract penal liabilities that may extend to seven years imprisonment and fine.

In addition, the government can also block the access to such services in case the intermediaries do not comply with the requirements of the government.

D. Is RIM liable under Indian Laws for any Breach of Indian Laws being Canadian Corporation and having the data in Canada?

RIM and for that purpose any service provider is liable under the local laws if they are providing services in India or if the data is being transmitted through Indian Computer, Computer Resource or Computer networks.

Section 75 of the Indian Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008 provides for the long arm statute to even cover the offenses committed outside India in contravention to the provisions of the Act.

Notwithstanding anything, the Indian government can certainly block the access of the services not complying with the Indian Laws.

In the case of Blackberry services in particular, the data is being originating from Indian Computer Resource and is subject to Indian laws. The intermediaries like RIM is under legal obligation to provide access to such communication as per prevailing laws.

E. Is this the beginning or end?

I think there can never be an end to the technological advancements nor to the government practices to regulate the Internet space. For last few months we have seen the steps taken by various countries including India to intercept the channels used by the criminals in the past to commit crime.

The reports also suggests that the Indian government is considering to ask Skype, Google and other VOIP service providers to provide similar access if they do want a blockage by the government. I think it’s high time that all of us should cooperate with the government agencies to ensure that nothing is done that is detrimental to the nation’s interest.

Nevertheless, we should also ensure the laws are not misused by either parties (Government, User or Intermediaries) to their own personal benefits.

(C) Gurpreet Singh, 2010 Authored By – Gurpreet Singh. Right of Reproduction subject to the acknowledgement to the Author with link to his website. All other Copyrights reserved with the author.

{ 0 comments }

Pantaloon Retail India Limited losses the Domain Name <pantaloons.com> in an administrative action with WIPO.

WIPO panelist Desmond J. Ryan AM denied the complaint filed by the complainant for the domain name <pantaloons.com> alleging infringement of their mark Pantaloon by RareNames

The Panelist observed that the Complainant undoubtedly had trademark rights in the name ‘Pantaloons’ for garments category in India but has failed to demonstrate any use or rights to the mark ‘Pantaloons’ outside India including United States of America where the Respondent is based. He further noted that the complainant’s mark is not known in the US market at all and there has been no evidence filed by the complainant to that effect.

The Panel also upholds the respondent’s contention that the word ‘Pantaloon’ is a dictionary word and is descriptive of garments. Furthermore, the Respondent has never offered the Domain for Sale targeted to the complainant or its competitor exclusively. He submitted that he is in business of acquiring and registering the generic and descriptive domain names.

The Respondent further submitted that he acquired knowledge of the complainant’s trade mark rights only after receiving the notice of the administrative proceedings from WIPO.

The Panel found that the Domain <pantaloons.com> is identical and confusingly similar to the complainant’s mark Pantaloon but the other two conditions of the UDRP Policy relating to Respondent’s Rights and Legitimate Interest and bad faith registration are not satisfied for which the complaint is denied by the panel.

The complete copy of the decision can be read here.

For any queries relating to Domain Name Management and Disputes, please do not hesitate to contact us at info@iprfirm.com

{ 0 comments }

The Trademark (Amendment) Rules, 2010 Notified

The Ministry of Commerce & Industry (Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion) notified The Trademark (Amendment) Rules, 2010 on May, 20, 2010.

The Amendment is made effective with respect to the Rule 62 sub rule 3 of the Trade Mark Rules, 2002 making it easy for the Registered Proprietor of the Trade Mark to get the duplicate or copy of the Trade Marks Certificate if not received by them at the first instance. The Registrar of Trade Marks, if satisfied, shall issue such copy without a payment of fee to the Registered Proprietor provided the request is received by the Registrar under Rule 62(3) before the expiry of the time limit for the renewal of the Registration or restoration of the Trade Mark.

The Second Amendment is made with respect to the classification of Services under the Fourth Schedule of the Rules. The services classified under class 42 has now been notified to be substituted as below

Class 42. Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software.

Class 43. Services for providing food and drink; temporary accommodation.

Class 44. Medical services, veterinary services, hygienic and beauty care for human beings or animals; agriculture, horticulture and forestry services.

Class 45. Legal services; security services for the protection of property and individuals; personal and social services rendered by others to meet the needs of individuals

The official copy of the notification can be downloaded here.

{ 0 comments }

World Intellectual Property (IP) Day 2010 – Innovation: Linking the World

We are celebrating 10 years of World IP Day this year and the theme set by World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is “Innovation: Linking The World”
We have seen lot of technological innovations this decade starting from shifting the mode we communicate with the world through emails to social networking and micro-blogging websites like Facebook and Twitter.

The innovative technologies helped us to reach the person sitting across the globe within seconds and helped the businesses to transform their global reach by marketing their products & services in any part of the world. The paradigm shift has been possible by the innovative technologies and the web. Though it has helped the businesses to go global, the new technologies have been a serious worry for the Intellectual Property (IP) Owners.

This decade had seen issues arising from Trademark abuse using keyword marketing, cyber-squatting, user name squatting to Copyright infringements due the very free nature of the Internet. However, it has also helped the business houses and the individuals to reach to their targeted audience from one part of the world. The technological innovations has helped us to link to the thousands of like minded peers and adding value to the economical and intellectual pool of the nations.

The courts in different countries also found hard to resolve the issues relating to jurisdiction and cause of action in the matters relating to Intellectual Property and the Internet. There has been lot of discrepancies in the enforcement of judgments and orders delivered by the courts in different jurisdictions making it hard to nab the pirators. However, recent trends have shown the courts in some jurisdictions have used the innovative technologies like FaceBook and Twitter to serve the respondents and the debtors.

Authored By : Gurpreet Singh, Internet Lawyer, New Delhi, India

Creative Commons License
World Intellectual Property (IP) Day 2010 – Innovation: Linking the World by Gurpreet Singh is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

{ 0 comments }

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes